Bank B and its client A have a banking relationship. First, the Federal Court considers that the parties were only bound by one-off investment advice contracts when the Respondent provided advisory services. Secondly, the lower court did not violate Art. 398 para. 2 CO by limiting the advisor’s obligation in an advisory contract to the mere “provision of information” (Informationsvermittlung).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>